Skip to content
Bugbot Effort Levels | My AI Guide

Bugbot Effort Levels

By Harsh Desai
Share

TL;DR

Teams admins and Individual plan users can now customize Bugbot effort levels for PR reviews with Default, High, or Custom configurations based on natural language instructions. Usage-based billing is required for customization.

What changed

Cursor added effort level controls for Bugbot on May 18 2026. Teams admins and Individual plan users can now choose Default, High, or Custom modes for PR reviews. Custom mode accepts natural language instructions but requires usage-based billing to activate.

The update applies only to PR review workflows inside the Cursor platform. No changes were announced for other AI features such as inline chat or composer.

Why it matters

Granular effort settings let builders match review depth to project risk without rewriting prompts each time. This shifts Cursor from a fixed AI reviewer toward a configurable service that competes with lighter open-source alternatives.

The move bets that users will accept usage billing once they see measurable differences in bug detection rates. It pressures competitors who still offer only one-size-fits-all PR checks.

How to use it

Open the Cursor dashboard and navigate to the Bugbot section under workspace settings. Enable usage-based billing first, then select Custom and enter instructions such as focus on security or limit suggestions to performance issues. Changes take effect on the next PR review.

Individual users follow the same path inside their personal account settings. Test on a single repository before rolling out to a team.

Watch for

Track whether Custom instructions reduce false positives on large codebases. The bet breaks if token costs exceed the value of extra reviews. Expect Cursor to add effort presets for other tools such as test generation next.

Who this matters for

  • Vibe Builders: Use Custom mode to align PR reviews with your specific brand voice or project style guides.
  • Developers: Toggle High effort for critical security modules to catch edge cases that Default reviews miss.

Harshs take

Cursor is moving toward a consumption model by gating the best features behind usage-based billing. This is a smart play for reliability: by letting users define effort levels via natural language, they solve the noise problem inherent in automated PR reviews. Builders should treat this as a specialized agent configuration rather than a generic tool update.

The shift to Custom instructions means you can finally stop fighting with generic AI feedback that ignores your specific architectural patterns. If you are on a team plan, the ROI here depends entirely on your ability to write tight, restrictive instructions that prevent token waste on trivial style nitpicks. It is a clear signal that Cursor wants to be the infrastructure for code quality, not just a text editor.

by Harsh Desai

Source:cursor.com

About Cursor

View the full Cursor page →All Cursor updates

Go deeper

More from Cursor

Everything AI. One email.
Every Monday.

New tools. Model launches. Plugins. Repos. Tactics. The moves the sharpest builders are making right now, before everyone else.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.